| THE
SLUMP OF '96
Chesters slump in form during
the second half of last season was dramatic to say the
least. At the turn of the year they had reached the
top of the table. True, this was largely because their
win at Exeter was the only Third Division match able
to go ahead on an otherwise snowbound last Saturday
of 1995. But Chesters position at the half way
stage ought to have been enough to secure promotion
or at least a play off position. As we know they didnt
manage either. A table compiled of results since January
1996 show that Chesters form was decidedly mediocre.
The attached table shows that Chester
would have been fifteenth if the season had started
in January and only two last gasp wins against Northampton
and Mansfield prevented their position being even worse.
Although City only lost once at home they drew more
matches than they won if they could have transformed
just one of their six home draws into a win they would
have made the play offs. In contrast, Herefords
transformation in fortune based on a mean defence and
the striking form of Steve White would have made them
league leaders.
So where did it all go wrong? As with
most things there is no simple solution. A bad run of
form tends to snowball just as winning breeds confidence.
Chester could justifiably point to their injury list
as a mitigating factor. Roger Preece, out since the
first match of the season, never played again. His strong
tackling was sorely missed in a midfield that at times
appeared lightweight. In that department Eddie Bishop
although now part time was also missing for much of
the second half of the season. David Flitcroft was the
third midfielder to be out for much of the season with
a long term injury. His robust challenges and confident
surges with the ball were also a missing dimension.
Although Citys midfield contained its most
skilful players, Priest, Fisher and Richardson often
just did not gel together. Why I cant say. It
was also disappointing to see Shelton, fit enough to
sit on the bench, not start more games after Christmas.
His influence in midfield is golden despite the advancing
years and the increasing occurrences of tackles well
past their sell by date.
Poor Iain Jenkins recovered after bad injury at Tottenham
only to crash his car just as he was about to break
into the first team again. He only got back towards
the end of the season. Arguably he was missed less as
Ross Davidson was signed from Sheffield Utd and fitted
in well as a positively aggressive full back. Up front
though Cyrille Regis long term lay off after Christmas
made Chester much less threatening in attack. Not only
was he scoring goals, his ability to hold the ball up
and so be the pivot of Citys forward movements
was crucial to their success in the first half of the
season. Whilst Big John Murphy did his best to fill
Cyrilles boots, scoring some timely goals, it
would be invidious to compare them.
Against the excuse of injuries it has to be said that
every team must expect them. The difference between
success and failure is often the willingness or ability
to strengthen the playing squad at the right time. During
the successful campaign of 1993-4 it was the goal scoring
of on-loan Graham Lancashire that helped tip the balance
in our favour. No such sign of either a ball winning
midfielder or a lively striker was forthcoming, presumably
because of lack of money.
This leaves the way open for the conspiracy theory
a well known phenomenon with smaller clubs. This states
that, for various reasons players fear they would
be out of their depth in a higher league; directors
fear they would have to pay higher wages or lose players
to richer clubs these deep psychological fears
subtly influence form. There were a few give away signs
of this to believers in conspiracy at the Deva. When
City were clear at the top of the league the chairman
talked in vague terms about a five year plan and getting
promotion in the next two or three seasons; the manager
talked about being happy if they finished tenth at the
end of the season. Whilst these would both be quite
reasonable ambitions at the beginning of the season,
they seemed rather unambitious coming as they did with
City in pole position. Few believed at the end of the
dismal 1994-5 campaign Chester would have bounced back
so well. Perhaps it even took the management by surprise.
In a funny kind of way I think most Chester supporters
realised that another quick promotion back to the Second
Division could have proved disastrous once again
the squad would have had to be strengthened considerably
or another relegation would have threatened and the
club badge really would have had to be replaced by a
yo-yo. As far as the management is concerned I am sure
that they wish the two halves of the season could have
been reversed. Then fans would have been happy and contented
with the logical progression made up the table, just
missing out on a play off place. Trouble is, these things
cant often be planned in a logical and orderly
fashion, you have to make the most of what you have.
Albert |